Explaining Compensation Gap AnalysisCompensation schemes are historically a cyclable topic whose time has come around once again. It has been my experience that when law firms begin a review of their partners' compensation, they start with a system that theoretically fits their needs and then they try to squeeze their firm into the system. This approach works for some, but for many, it serves to redirect the frustration they were experiencing that made them choose to review their compensation approach in the first place. To overcome these obstacles, we have developed a straightforward, two‐step approach, labelled the "compensation gap analysis". Step One ‐ Identify and prioritize the behaviours required to achieve your firm's strategic goals. Again, there is little rocket science in identifying the behaviour that most plans require to have a chance of succeeding. The challenge is achieving a weighted consensus based on their priority. RANK DESIRED BEHAVIOURS
The above chart is not an exhaustive list but rather a typical list. Firms should customize this list to align with their values and strategic direction for the most significant impact. Step Two ‐ Complete the Compensation Gap AnalysisIn this step, we take the behaviours identified in Step One and determine where, if any, there is a gap between the desired behaviours and those driven by the current compensation system. DETERMINE UNSUPPORTED DESIRED BEHAVIORS
The fourth column identifies the "No" answers from the second column and indicates the weighted priority the partners have assigned to that behaviour from Step One. If the behaviours in the fourth column are all priority "8s", "9s," or "10s," then while some tweaking may be in order, a wholesale change out of the system is not necessary. However, suppose there are several Nos in this gap column where the priority is "1s", "2s" and "3s". In that case, the likelihood of successfully achieving the firm's desired behaviours or strategic goals is reduced without implementing wholesale changes to the firm's compensation system. These gaps, combined with the notoriously poor track record of execution in many law firms, will increase the risk of failure to unacceptable levels. Remedial action by the firm's leadership and partners is imperative. Remember, without a formal strategic plan, your compensation system is your strategic plan! Is it worth following? Who is Stephen Mabey? Stephen Mabey is a CPA, CA, and Applied Strategies, Inc.'s Managing Director. His credentials include the following:
Stephen has advised law firms on a wide range of law firm issues, including - strategic action planning, leadership, understudy (succession) planning, business development, capitalization of partnerships, partnership agreements, lawyer & staff engagement, marketing, key performance indicators, competitive intelligence, finance, mergers, practice transitioning, compensation arrangements, organizational structures, and partnership arrangements. Stephen can be reached by email – at smabey@appliedstrategies.ca or by phone at 902.499.3895. |